Kyrgyzstan Flash Appeal (Revised) 2008
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Kyrgyzstan Flash Appeal (Revised) 2008
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/308/summary
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
09-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Russian Federation, Government of | 2.0 | 25.0% |
| Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 2.0 | 24.7% |
| United Kingdom, Government of | 0.9 | 11.7% |
| Switzerland, Government of | 0.4 | 5.4% |
| Greece, Government of | 0.2 | 2.5% |
| UNICEF National Committee/Netherlands | 0.1 | 1.5% |
| Türkiye, Government of | 0.1 | 1.3% |
| United States of America, Government of | 0.1 | 0.9% |
| Sweden, Government of | 0.1 | 0.8% |
| Agency for Technical Cooperation and Development | 0.0 | 0.5% |
Funding progress by cluster
Kyrgyzstan Flash Appeal (Revised) 2008
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/308/summary
Funding progress by cluster
09-Dec-2024
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Child Protection / Education | 0.7 | 0.3 | 43.0% |
| Coordination | 0.3 | 0.3 | 101.1% |
| Food Security | 10.9 | 7.2 | 66.0% |
| Health | 1.3 | 0.1 | 4.1% |
| Shelter | 0.9 | 0.1 | 16.4% |
| Water, Sanitation and Hygiene | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.8% |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2008
Kyrgyzstan Flash Appeal (Revised) 2008
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/308/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2008
09-Dec-2024