occupied Palestinian territory 2010
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
05-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 86.8 | 26.3% |
European Commission | 54.7 | 16.6% |
Canada, Government of | 19.6 | 5.9% |
Spain, Government of | 14.7 | 4.5% |
Denmark, Government of | 13.9 | 4.2% |
Sweden, Government of | 11.8 | 3.6% |
Japan, Government of | 10.0 | 3.0% |
Australia, Government of | 8.2 | 2.5% |
Italy, Government of | 7.5 | 2.3% |
Netherlands, Government of | 7.0 | 2.1% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
AGRICULTURE | 46.6 | 11.2 | 24.0% |
CASH FOR WORK AND CASH ASSISTANCE | 193.0 | 67.1 | 34.8% |
COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES | 23.3 | 22.1 | 94.7% |
EDUCATION | 24.0 | 4.2 | 17.4% |
FOOD SECURITY | 183.2 | 117.3 | 64.1% |
HEALTH AND NUTRITION | 22.4 | 18.7 | 83.5% |
PROTECTION | 55.4 | 30.6 | 55.2% |
SHELTER AND NON-FOOD ITEMS | 17.0 | 10.6 | 62.3% |
WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE | 38.6 | 15.6 | 40.6% |
Not specified | n/a | -18.7 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2010
occupied Palestinian territory 2010
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/316/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2010
05-Dec-2024