Zimbabwe 2010
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
01-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 63.6 | 28.1% |
European Commission | 27.3 | 12.1% |
Japan, Government of | 13.7 | 6.1% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 10.4 | 4.6% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 8.8 | 3.9% |
Australia, Government of | 7.6 | 3.3% |
Sweden, Government of | 7.1 | 3.1% |
Netherlands, Government of | 5.0 | 2.2% |
Algeria, Government of | 3.1 | 1.4% |
Spain, Government of | 2.8 | 1.2% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
AGRICULTURE | 108.8 | 17.0 | 15.6% |
COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES | 4.2 | 3.5 | 83.1% |
EARLY RECOVERY | 5.3 | 1.2 | 22.5% |
EDUCATION | 36.4 | 4.0 | 10.9% |
FOOD | 138.0 | 132.1 | 95.7% |
HEALTH | 80.2 | 32.1 | 40.0% |
MULTI-SECTOR | 25.9 | 9.3 | 35.9% |
NUTRITION | 11.9 | 4.8 | 40.3% |
PROTECTION | 20.3 | 2.1 | 10.4% |
WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE | 47.4 | 15.9 | 33.6% |
Not specified | n/a | 4.2 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2010
Zimbabwe 2010
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/322/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2010
01-Dec-2024