Nepal Humanitarian Transition Appeal 2010
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
10-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
Nepal, Government of | 10.5 | 14.9% |
European Commission | 10.0 | 14.2% |
United States of America, Government of | 1.7 | 2.4% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 1.0 | 1.5% |
Japan, Government of | 0.8 | 1.1% |
Finland, Government of | 0.7 | 1.0% |
Private (individuals & organizations) | 0.6 | 0.8% |
Sweden, Government of | 0.5 | 0.7% |
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
COORDINATION | 1.8 | 0.8 | 42.1% |
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS | 3.6 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION | 93.2 | 53.1 | 57.0% |
REFUGEES (Multi-sector) | 26.5 | 16.5 | 62.2% |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2010
Nepal Humanitarian Transition Appeal 2010
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/327/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2010
10-Dec-2024