Mongolia Dzud Appeal (April 2010 - May 2011)
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
04-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
04-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
European Commission | 1.0 | 28.5% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 0.6 | 17.8% |
Australia, Government of | 0.4 | 12.6% |
Brazil, Government of | 0.4 | 10.4% |
Austria, Government of | 0.3 | 8.8% |
United States of America, Government of | 0.3 | 7.4% |
Singapore, Government of | 0.0 | 0.4% |
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
AGRICULTURE | 7.8 | 2.3 | 30.0% |
EARLY RECOVERY | 4.4 | 0.4 | 7.9% |
EDUCATION | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
SURVIVAL, WASH, HEALTH & NUTRITION | 3.1 | 0.7 | 22.2% |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2010
Mongolia Dzud Appeal (April 2010 - May 2011)
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/340/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2010
04-Dec-2024