Kyrgyzstan Flash Appeal (Revised) (June 2010 - June 2011)
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
09-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 17.5 | 25.6% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 11.2 | 16.3% |
Japan, Government of | 6.3 | 9.2% |
Russian Federation, Government of | 6.3 | 9.2% |
European Commission | 5.3 | 7.7% |
Sweden, Government of | 2.9 | 4.2% |
Private (individuals & organizations) | 2.5 | 3.6% |
Norway, Government of | 1.9 | 2.7% |
Canada, Government of | 1.5 | 2.1% |
UNICEF National Committee/Netherlands | 0.8 | 1.1% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
COMMUNITY RESTORATION | 6.2 | 0.9 | 13.9% |
COORDINATION SUPPORT SERVICES | 1.6 | 2.0 | 125.3% |
EDUCATION | 3.3 | 1.3 | 39.0% |
FOOD SECURITY AND AGRICULTURE | 33.1 | 23.4 | 70.5% |
HEALTH | 3.9 | 1.5 | 39.1% |
LOGISTICS | 1.4 | 0.7 | 49.6% |
PROTECTION | 13.2 | 12.4 | 94.3% |
SHELTER | 22.2 | 15.4 | 69.2% |
TELECOMMUNICATIONS | 0.4 | 0.2 | 63.9% |
WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE | 2.1 | 0.0 | 1.4% |
WITHDRAWN PROJECTS | 6.8 | 6.8 | 100.0% |
Not specified | n/a | 4.0 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2010
Kyrgyzstan Flash Appeal (Revised) (June 2010 - June 2011)
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/344/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2010
09-Dec-2024