occupied Palestinian territory 2011
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
05-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 88.5 | 28.9% |
European Commission | 54.7 | 17.8% |
Canada, Government of | 30.7 | 10.0% |
Sweden, Government of | 17.9 | 5.8% |
Belgium, Government of | 11.6 | 3.8% |
Norway, Government of | 10.4 | 3.4% |
Netherlands, Government of | 7.4 | 2.4% |
Japan, Government of | 6.6 | 2.2% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 5.8 | 1.9% |
Germany, Government of | 5.7 | 1.8% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
AGRICULTURE | 35.6 | 13.3 | 37.2% |
CASH FOR WORK AND CASH ASSISTANCE | 143.8 | 57.0 | 39.6% |
COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES | 20.9 | 21.4 | 102.8% |
EDUCATION | 16.4 | 4.9 | 30.0% |
FOOD SECURITY | 204.0 | 130.6 | 64.1% |
HEALTH AND NUTRITION | 21.1 | 16.4 | 77.5% |
PROTECTION | 39.8 | 28.0 | 70.3% |
SHELTER AND NON-FOOD ITEMS | 21.6 | 9.0 | 41.5% |
WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE | 33.8 | 13.1 | 38.9% |
Not specified | n/a | 12.9 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2011
occupied Palestinian territory 2011
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/348/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2011
05-Dec-2024