Zimbabwe 2011
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
01-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 54.0 | 24.4% |
European Commission | 42.5 | 19.1% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 15.0 | 6.8% |
Netherlands, Government of | 8.4 | 3.8% |
Japan, Government of | 8.0 | 3.6% |
Australia, Government of | 7.3 | 3.3% |
Germany, Government of | 6.5 | 2.9% |
Sweden, Government of | 5.9 | 2.7% |
Spain, Government of | 5.0 | 2.3% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 3.1 | 1.4% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
AGRICULTURE | 80.6 | 46.4 | 57.5% |
COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES | 4.5 | 2.7 | 60.9% |
EDUCATION | 22.4 | 5.4 | 24.0% |
FOOD | 167.7 | 112.6 | 67.2% |
HEALTH | 28.3 | 9.4 | 33.2% |
LIVELIHOODS, INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING & INFRASTRUCTURE | 31.1 | 6.9 | 22.2% |
MULTI-SECTOR | 26.4 | 3.6 | 13.6% |
NUTRITION | 14.2 | 4.1 | 28.6% |
PROTECTION | 41.8 | 8.1 | 19.5% |
WATER,SANITATION AND HYGIENE | 61.6 | 21.3 | 34.6% |
Not specified | n/a | 1.3 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2011
Zimbabwe 2011
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/356/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2011
01-Dec-2024