Northern Caucasus (Russian Federation) 2001
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
10-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
10-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 18.4 | 49.6% |
European Commission | 5.5 | 14.9% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 2.5 | 6.8% |
Netherlands, Government of | 2.3 | 6.2% |
Sweden, Government of | 2.0 | 5.3% |
Canada, Government of | 1.3 | 3.5% |
Japan, Government of | 1.2 | 3.3% |
Switzerland, Government of | 1.1 | 2.9% |
Denmark, Government of | 0.7 | 1.8% |
Germany, Government of | 0.5 | 1.3% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 37.2 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2001
Northern Caucasus (Russian Federation) 2001
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/37/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2001
10-Dec-2024