Niger 2012
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
13-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 87.9 | 28.1% |
European Commission | 59.4 | 19.0% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 25.3 | 8.1% |
Australia, Government of | 20.4 | 6.5% |
Canada, Government of | 16.3 | 5.2% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 13.9 | 4.4% |
Japan, Government of | 7.5 | 2.4% |
France, Government of | 6.2 | 2.0% |
Brazil, Government of | 6.0 | 1.9% |
Sweden, Government of | 5.8 | 1.9% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
COORDINATION/IM AND SUPPORT SERVICES | 3.7 | 1.8 | 47.8% |
EARLY RECOVERY | 7.3 | 5.5 | 75.1% |
EDUCATION | 2.5 | 1.6 | 65.3% |
FOOD SECURITY | 276.4 | 193.2 | 69.9% |
HEALTH | 13.1 | 5.4 | 40.8% |
LOGISTICS | 9.0 | 11.3 | 125.5% |
MULTI-SECTOR | 52.3 | 4.7 | 9.0% |
NUTRITION | 116.0 | 81.1 | 69.9% |
PROTECTION | 2.5 | 1.0 | 38.1% |
WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE | 6.8 | 7.0 | 103.2% |
Not specified | n/a | 0.2 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2012
Niger 2012
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/379/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2012
13-Dec-2024