occupied Palestinian territory 2013
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
05-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 100.4 | 37.2% |
European Commission | 34.5 | 12.8% |
Canada, Government of | 20.4 | 7.6% |
Japan, Government of | 17.5 | 6.5% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 16.1 | 5.9% |
Germany, Government of | 13.5 | 5.0% |
Sweden, Government of | 12.5 | 4.6% |
Belgium, Government of | 8.4 | 3.1% |
Norway, Government of | 7.9 | 2.9% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 7.6 | 2.8% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
AGRICULTURE | 31.7 | 15.2 | 48.0% |
CASH FOR WORK | 70.5 | 38.2 | 54.2% |
COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES | 21.3 | 20.3 | 95.1% |
EDUCATION | 22.4 | 8.2 | 36.6% |
FOOD | 160.1 | 127.3 | 79.5% |
HEALTH AND NUTRITION | 22.5 | 11.8 | 52.2% |
PROTECTION | 53.1 | 33.4 | 62.9% |
WATER, SANITATION AND HYGIENE | 19.3 | 6.0 | 31.3% |
Not specified | n/a | 9.7 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2013
occupied Palestinian territory 2013
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/398/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2013
05-Dec-2024