Zimbabwe 2013
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Zimbabwe 2013
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/415/summary
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
01-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America, Government of | 23.8 | 31.2% |
| United Kingdom, Government of | 12.1 | 15.8% |
| European Commission | 9.8 | 12.8% |
| Not specified | 8.6 | 11.3% |
| Japan, Government of | 5.3 | 6.9% |
| Switzerland, Government of | 4.3 | 5.6% |
| Canada, Government of | 3.5 | 4.5% |
| Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 2.0 | 2.6% |
| Australia, Government of | 1.5 | 2.0% |
| Sweden, Government of | 1.1 | 1.4% |
Funding progress by cluster
Zimbabwe 2013
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/415/summary
Funding progress by cluster
01-Dec-2024
Not specified: US$1,316,524
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES | 2.5 | 1.2 | 47.1% |
| FOOD | 126.7 | 67.2 | 53.1% |
| HEALTH | 3.7 | 1.7 | 46.4% |
| PROTECTION | 10.2 | 2.2 | 21.7% |
| SHELTER AND NFIs | 0.3 | 0.3 | 100.0% |
| WATER,SANITATION AND HYGIENE | 3.6 | 2.6 | 72.2% |
| Not specified | n/a | 1.3 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2013
Zimbabwe 2013
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/415/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2013
01-Dec-2024