Myanmar 2014
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
01-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
European Commission | 21.8 | 16.9% |
United States of America, Government of | 19.5 | 15.1% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 17.8 | 13.8% |
Not specified | 17.5 | 13.6% |
Japan, Government of | 15.2 | 11.8% |
Australia, Government of | 8.4 | 6.5% |
Germany, Government of | 6.7 | 5.2% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 5.5 | 4.3% |
Canada, Government of | 2.7 | 2.1% |
Sweden, Government of | 2.2 | 1.7% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Camp Coordination and Camp Management | 4.0 | 2.6 | 64.7% |
Coordination and Common Services | 5.4 | 4.8 | 90.3% |
Early Recovery | 20.0 | 4.5 | 22.4% |
Education | 9.2 | 5.4 | 58.6% |
Food | 53.3 | 49.8 | 93.3% |
Health | 24.6 | 6.5 | 26.6% |
Nutrition | 10.3 | 2.8 | 27.6% |
Protection | 18.9 | 10.2 | 54.0% |
Shelter/ Non-Food Items | 15.8 | 7.1 | 45.2% |
Water, Sanitation and Hygiene | 30.6 | 21.5 | 70.2% |
Not specified | n/a | 13.7 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2014
Myanmar 2014
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/449/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2014
01-Dec-2024