South Sudan Regional Refugee Response Plan (Ethiopia, Kenya, Sudan and Uganda) 2014
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
03-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
03-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 118.7 | 33.4% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 80.1 | 22.5% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 56.1 | 15.8% |
European Commission | 25.6 | 7.2% |
Netherlands, Government of | 10.3 | 2.9% |
Private (individuals & organizations) | 9.8 | 2.8% |
Japan, Government of | 9.6 | 2.7% |
Sweden, Government of | 8.1 | 2.3% |
Not specified | 7.9 | 2.2% |
Germany, Government of | 7.6 | 2.1% |
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
MULTI-SECTOR (REFUGEES) | 657.7 | 355.4 | 54.0% |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2014
South Sudan Regional Refugee Response Plan (Ethiopia, Kenya, Sudan and Uganda) 2014
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/451/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2014
03-Dec-2024