occupied Palestinian territory 2015
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
05-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 136.9 | 34.4% |
Japan, Government of | 41.4 | 10.4% |
Saudi Arabia (Kingdom of), Government of | 38.5 | 9.7% |
Germany, Government of | 22.4 | 5.6% |
European Commission | 21.0 | 5.3% |
Canada, Government of | 13.2 | 3.3% |
Sweden, Government of | 13.0 | 3.3% |
Norway, Government of | 10.1 | 2.5% |
Islamic Development Bank | 10.0 | 2.5% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 8.4 | 2.1% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Coordination and Support Services | 23.2 | 15.6 | 67.3% |
Education | 20.3 | 9.3 | 45.6% |
Food Security | 325.0 | 196.7 | 60.5% |
Health and Nutrition | 21.2 | 10.4 | 49.0% |
Protection | 51.9 | 33.9 | 65.3% |
Shelter/NFI | 225.2 | 104.8 | 46.6% |
WASH | 39.2 | 19.9 | 50.7% |
Not specified | n/a | 7.4 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2015
occupied Palestinian territory 2015
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/459/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2015
05-Dec-2024