Maluku Crisis 2001
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Maluku Crisis 2001
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/47/summary
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
12-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands, Government of | 1.5 | 46.2% |
| Japan, Government of | 0.7 | 21.4% |
| Australia, Government of | 0.5 | 15.0% |
| Sweden, Government of | 0.3 | 7.6% |
| New Zealand, Government of | 0.2 | 6.3% |
| Norway, Government of | 0.1 | 3.4% |
| Cyprus, Government of | 0.0 | 0.1% |
Funding progress by cluster
Maluku Crisis 2001
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/47/summary
Funding progress by cluster
12-Dec-2024
Not specified: US$3,321,314
Funding progress by cluster/sector
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2001
Maluku Crisis 2001
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/47/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2001
12-Dec-2024