South Sudan regional refugee response plan 2015 (Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda components)
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
03-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
03-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 79.8 | 37.7% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 26.4 | 12.5% |
European Commission | 17.9 | 8.5% |
Japan, Government of | 14.2 | 6.7% |
Not specified | 9.5 | 4.5% |
Canada, Government of | 6.2 | 2.9% |
Switzerland, Government of | 5.1 | 2.4% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 4.9 | 2.3% |
Sweden, Government of | 4.5 | 2.1% |
Australia, Government of | 3.7 | 1.8% |
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Multi-sector assistance for refugees | 657.8 | 211.3 | 32.1% |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2015
South Sudan regional refugee response plan 2015 (Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda components)
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/481/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2015
03-Dec-2024