Libya 2015-2016
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
01-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
European Commission | 14.9 | 22.1% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 11.4 | 17.0% |
Qatar, Government of | 9.5 | 14.1% |
Germany, Government of | 4.8 | 7.2% |
United States of America, Government of | 4.2 | 6.2% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 3.7 | 5.5% |
Italy, Government of | 3.5 | 5.2% |
Not specified | 1.9 | 2.8% |
Netherlands, Government of | 1.7 | 2.5% |
Canada, Government of | 1.5 | 2.2% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Coordination and support services | 0.8 | 0.3 | 42.4% |
Early Recovery | 10.2 | 1.0 | 9.8% |
Education | 4.6 | 0.7 | 15.4% |
Food security | 40.5 | 13.0 | 32.1% |
Health | 41.8 | 15.4 | 36.8% |
Protection | 18.3 | 8.3 | 45.2% |
Refugee and migrant response | 43.7 | 15.4 | 35.3% |
Shelter and NFIs | 10.0 | 6.1 | 60.5% |
WASH | 2.6 | 1.0 | 38.8% |
Not specified | n/a | 6.2 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
Libya 2015-2016
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/487/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
01-Dec-2024