Angola 2000
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Angola 2000
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/49/summary
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
16-Feb-2026
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America, Government of | 33.0 | 23.3% |
| Sweden, Government of | 6.9 | 4.9% |
| Norway, Government of | 4.4 | 3.1% |
| Germany, Government of | 3.5 | 2.5% |
| Netherlands, Government of | 3.5 | 2.5% |
| Canada, Government of | 3.2 | 2.3% |
| France, Government of | 2.7 | 1.9% |
| Italy, Government of | 2.4 | 1.7% |
| Denmark, Government of | 2.3 | 1.6% |
| European Commission | 1.7 | 1.2% |
Funding progress by cluster
Angola 2000
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/49/summary
Funding progress by cluster
16-Feb-2026
: US$0
Not specified: US$141,527,669
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
| Not specified | n/a | 141.5 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2000
Angola 2000
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/49/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2000
16-Feb-2026