Senegal 2016
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Senegal 2016
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/498/summary
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
12-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| European Commission | 2.4 | 36.5% |
| Not specified | 1.5 | 23.5% |
| Luxembourg, Government of | 1.0 | 14.9% |
| France, Government of | 0.9 | 13.8% |
| United States of America, Government of | 0.3 | 4.8% |
| UNICEF National Committee/Germany | 0.1 | 2.2% |
| UNICEF National Committee/Spain | 0.1 | 2.0% |
| UNICEF National Committee/Denmark | 0.1 | 1.8% |
| UNICEF National Committee/Australia | 0.0 | 0.3% |
| UNICEF National Committee/United Kingdom | 0.0 | 0.3% |
Funding progress by cluster
Senegal 2016
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/498/summary
Funding progress by cluster
12-Dec-2024
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| COORDINATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| FOOD SECURITY | 9.5 | 0.6 | 6.0% |
| NUTRITION | 8.6 | 5.6 | 65.9% |
| WATER AND SANITATION | 1.7 | 0.3 | 19.1% |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
Senegal 2016
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/498/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
12-Dec-2024