occupied Palestinian territory 2016
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
05-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 115.0 | 40.5% |
Germany, Government of | 27.1 | 9.6% |
European Commission | 25.0 | 8.8% |
Canada, Government of | 20.8 | 7.3% |
Japan, Government of | 20.4 | 7.2% |
Belgium, Government of | 15.5 | 5.4% |
Sweden, Government of | 11.7 | 4.1% |
Saudi Arabia (Kingdom of), Government of | 11.0 | 3.9% |
Switzerland, Government of | 7.2 | 2.5% |
Norway, Government of | 7.0 | 2.5% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Coordination and Support Services | 16.5 | 10.3 | 62.3% |
Education | 18.0 | 7.2 | 39.9% |
Food Security | 322.8 | 159.4 | 49.4% |
Health and Nutrition | 25.8 | 9.3 | 36.2% |
Protection | 45.9 | 27.6 | 60.1% |
Shelterr NFIs | 112.1 | 45.0 | 40.2% |
WASH | 29.6 | 9.2 | 31.0% |
Not specified | n/a | 15.8 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
occupied Palestinian territory 2016
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/504/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
05-Dec-2024