Myanmar 2016
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
01-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
Japan, Government of | 26.6 | 23.9% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 20.4 | 18.3% |
United States of America, Government of | 14.6 | 13.1% |
European Commission | 11.1 | 10.0% |
Switzerland, Government of | 8.2 | 7.4% |
Germany, Government of | 4.9 | 4.4% |
Denmark, Government of | 4.6 | 4.1% |
Australia, Government of | 4.0 | 3.6% |
Sweden, Government of | 3.9 | 3.5% |
Canada, Government of | 2.9 | 2.6% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
CCCM/Shelter/NFIs | 16.7 | 9.3 | 55.6% |
Common Services | 6.1 | 2.3 | 37.4% |
Education | 9.0 | 2.2 | 24.3% |
Food Security | 80.2 | 48.9 | 61.0% |
Health | 22.9 | 4.1 | 17.8% |
Nutrition | 8.9 | 6.5 | 72.9% |
Protection | 27.5 | 11.6 | 42.3% |
WASH | 18.2 | 15.8 | 86.7% |
Not specified | n/a | 10.5 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
Myanmar 2016
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/515/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
01-Dec-2024