Burundi 2016
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
12-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 19.0 | 30.8% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 13.0 | 21.1% |
Germany, Government of | 10.5 | 17.1% |
Japan, Government of | 4.0 | 6.5% |
Belgium, Government of | 2.9 | 4.7% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 2.0 | 3.2% |
France, Government of | 1.7 | 2.7% |
European Commission | 1.5 | 2.5% |
Private (individuals & organizations) | 0.8 | 1.2% |
Ireland, Government of | 0.5 | 0.9% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
ABRIS ET ARTICLES NON ALIMENTAIRES | 5.2 | 1.2 | 22.1% |
COORDINATION | 1.6 | 0.9 | 56.6% |
EAU, HYGIENE ET ASSAINISSEMENT | 6.6 | 1.2 | 17.9% |
EDUCATION | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
NUTRITION | 10.0 | 3.6 | 36.0% |
PROTECTION | 11.9 | 5.8 | 49.0% |
RELEVEMENT PRECOCE | 4.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
SANTE | 10.0 | 1.9 | 19.3% |
SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE | 10.0 | 5.4 | 54.2% |
SECTEUR NON SPECIFIE | n/a | 41.5 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
Burundi 2016
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/518/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
12-Dec-2024