Zimbabwe Humanitarian Response Plan 2016
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
01-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 98.5 | 57.6% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 27.7 | 16.2% |
European Commission | 11.5 | 6.8% |
Japan, Government of | 6.4 | 3.8% |
Canada, Government of | 5.5 | 3.2% |
Sweden, Government of | 2.5 | 1.5% |
Zimbabwe, Government of | 2.4 | 1.4% |
Germany, Government of | 1.7 | 1.0% |
Italy, Government of | 1.1 | 0.6% |
UNICEF National Committee/Japan | 0.6 | 0.4% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Coordination | 0.6 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
Food Security and Agriculture | 278.6 | 100.1 | 35.9% |
Nutrition and Health | 25.7 | 4.6 | 17.8% |
Protection | 8.7 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
WASH | 38.8 | 15.5 | 39.9% |
Not specified | n/a | 50.7 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
Zimbabwe Humanitarian Response Plan 2016
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/519/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
01-Dec-2024