DPR Korea Needs and Priorities 2016
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
01-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 13.1 | 34.5% |
Switzerland, Government of | 9.6 | 25.4% |
European Commission | 3.4 | 9.0% |
Russian Federation, Government of | 3.0 | 7.9% |
Canada, Government of | 2.0 | 5.3% |
Sweden, Government of | 1.8 | 4.7% |
India, Government of | 1.0 | 2.6% |
Germany, Government of | 0.8 | 2.2% |
United Nations Children's Fund | 0.6 | 1.5% |
Private (individuals & organizations) | 0.4 | 1.1% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Education | 1.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
Food Security | 26.2 | 5.4 | 20.6% |
Health | 35.8 | 5.9 | 16.4% |
Nutrition | 58.7 | 21.0 | 35.7% |
Shelter | 1.1 | 0.3 | 31.4% |
WASH | 19.3 | 5.2 | 27.0% |
Not specified | n/a | 0.1 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
DPR Korea Needs and Priorities 2016
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/521/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
01-Dec-2024