Mosul Flash Appeal 2016
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 149.5 | 53.7% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 30.4 | 10.9% |
Germany, Government of | 26.3 | 9.5% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 13.0 | 4.7% |
European Commission | 8.8 | 3.2% |
Italy, Government of | 3.2 | 1.1% |
Sweden, Government of | 0.8 | 0.3% |
New Zealand, Government of | 0.8 | 0.3% |
Private (individuals & organizations) | 0.8 | 0.3% |
Ireland, Government of | 0.7 | 0.2% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
CCCM | 10.0 | 1.0 | 9.8% |
Common Services and Coordination | 0.5 | 0.3 | 68.3% |
Education | 10.0 | 3.8 | 37.8% |
ETC | 1.2 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
Food Assistance | 50.0 | 29.1 | 58.1% |
Health | 35.0 | 27.8 | 79.6% |
Logistics | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
Protection | 25.0 | 2.8 | 11.4% |
Rapid Response Mechanism | 2.0 | 0.5 | 25.0% |
Shelter and NFI | 110.0 | 20.1 | 18.3% |
WASH | 35.0 | 26.5 | 75.9% |
Not specified | n/a | 166.7 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
Mosul Flash Appeal 2016
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/523/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
10-Dec-2024