2016 Europe Situation -Regional Refugee and Migrant Response
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
04-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
04-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
European Commission | 355.7 | 62.7% |
Private (individuals & organizations) | 71.8 | 12.6% |
United States of America, Government of | 59.9 | 10.6% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 31.0 | 5.5% |
Germany, Government of | 11.6 | 2.0% |
Japan, Government of | 9.4 | 1.7% |
Not specified | 7.3 | 1.3% |
Council of Europe Development Bank | 5.8 | 1.0% |
Norway, Government of | 3.2 | 0.6% |
Canada, Government of | 3.0 | 0.5% |
Funding progress by cluster/sector
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
2016 Europe Situation -Regional Refugee and Migrant Response
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/534/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2016
04-Dec-2024