Uganda 2000
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Uganda 2000
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/61/summary
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
10-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America, Government of | 4.4 | 25.7% |
| Not specified | 4.1 | 23.5% |
| United Kingdom, Government of | 3.2 | 18.6% |
| Japan, Government of | 2.8 | 16.2% |
| Sweden, Government of | 0.8 | 4.9% |
| Belgium, Government of | 0.6 | 3.4% |
| Australia, Government of | 0.4 | 2.6% |
| Germany, Government of | 0.2 | 0.9% |
| Stichting Vluchteling | 0.1 | 0.6% |
| Norway, Government of | 0.1 | 0.5% |
Funding progress by cluster
Uganda 2000
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/61/summary
Funding progress by cluster
10-Dec-2024
: US$0
Not specified: US$17,237,656
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
| Not specified | n/a | 17.2 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2000
Uganda 2000
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/61/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2000
10-Dec-2024