Northern Caucasus (Russian Federation) 1999
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
10-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
10-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United States of America, Government of | 17.3 | 37.8% |
Norway, Government of | 3.7 | 8.0% |
United Kingdom, Government of | 3.5 | 7.6% |
European Commission | 2.6 | 5.8% |
Netherlands, Government of | 2.5 | 5.4% |
Canada, Government of | 2.4 | 5.2% |
Denmark, Government of | 1.9 | 4.2% |
Switzerland, Government of | 1.9 | 4.1% |
Germany, Government of | 1.1 | 2.4% |
Sweden, Government of | 1.1 | 2.3% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 45.7 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 1999
Northern Caucasus (Russian Federation) 1999
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/62/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 1999
10-Dec-2024