Republic of Congo 2017
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
12-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 4.4 | 39.5% |
China, Government of | 4.0 | 36.2% |
United States of America, Government of | 1.8 | 15.9% |
European Commission | 0.4 | 3.3% |
France, Government of | 0.2 | 2.1% |
Italy, Government of | 0.2 | 1.9% |
Malta, Government of | 0.1 | 0.5% |
UNICEF National Committee/United Kingdom | 0.1 | 0.5% |
Private (individuals & organizations) | 0.0 | 0.1% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Abris-AME | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
Coordination et support services | 0.1 | 0.2 | 179.7% |
Education | 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
EHA | 2.2 | 0.5 | 22.7% |
Nutrition | 1.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
Protection | 1.0 | 0.1 | 14.6% |
Relevement Precoce | 2.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
Sante | 2.0 | 1.5 | 74.1% |
Securite Alimentaire | 11.0 | 7.7 | 69.6% |
Not specified | n/a | 1.1 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2017
Republic of Congo 2017
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/626/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2017
12-Dec-2024