Occupied Palestinian Territory Humanitarian Response Strategy 2018
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
04-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
Germany, Government of | 48.0 | 19.7% |
European Commission | 37.7 | 15.5% |
Multiple donors through Central Emergency Response Fund | 18.7 | 7.6% |
Canada, Government of | 14.0 | 5.7% |
Switzerland, Government of | 13.9 | 5.7% |
Norway, Government of | 13.7 | 5.6% |
Sweden, Government of | 11.0 | 4.5% |
Japan, Government of | 9.6 | 3.9% |
Belgium, Government of | 9.2 | 3.8% |
Australia, Government of | 8.7 | 3.6% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Coordination and Support Services | 27.2 | 7.7 | 28.5% |
Education | 20.3 | 5.9 | 29.0% |
Food Security Sector | 288.9 | 122.3 | 42.3% |
Health and Nutrition Cluster | 27.0 | 20.2 | 75.0% |
Protection | 40.9 | 18.4 | 45.0% |
Shelter/NFIs | 90.0 | 12.0 | 13.3% |
WASH | 45.5 | 11.9 | 26.2% |
Not specified | n/a | 45.6 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2018
Occupied Palestinian Territory Humanitarian Response Strategy 2018
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/633/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2018
04-Dec-2024