Maluku Crisis 2000
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Maluku Crisis 2000
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/66/summary
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
12-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Australia, Government of | 4.1 | 50.9% |
| Netherlands, Government of | 2.3 | 28.0% |
| Japan, Government of | 1.0 | 12.3% |
| Sweden, Government of | 0.4 | 4.9% |
| New Zealand, Government of | 0.2 | 2.1% |
| UNICEF National Committee/Netherlands | 0.2 | 1.8% |
Funding progress by cluster
Maluku Crisis 2000
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/66/summary
Funding progress by cluster
12-Dec-2024
Not specified: US$8,155,538
Funding progress by cluster/sector
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2000
Maluku Crisis 2000
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/66/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2000
12-Dec-2024