Afghanistan 2002 (ITAP for the Afghan People)
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Afghanistan 2002 (ITAP for the Afghan People)
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/92/summary
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
16-Jan-2026
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| United States of America, Government of | 356.5 | 29.8% |
| Japan, Government of | 162.2 | 13.6% |
| European Commission | 75.9 | 6.3% |
| United Kingdom, Government of | 68.6 | 5.7% |
| Not specified | 63.0 | 5.3% |
| Netherlands, Government of | 58.2 | 4.9% |
| Germany, Government of | 42.5 | 3.5% |
| Italy, Government of | 41.4 | 3.5% |
| UNICEF National Committees | 39.6 | 3.3% |
| Sweden, Government of | 32.4 | 2.7% |
Funding progress by cluster
Afghanistan 2002 (ITAP for the Afghan People)
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/92/summary
Funding progress by cluster
16-Jan-2026
: US$0
Not specified: US$1,196,693,956
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
| Not specified | n/a | 1,196.7 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2002
Afghanistan 2002 (ITAP for the Afghan People)
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/92/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2002
16-Jan-2026