Joint Appeal - Solutions for East Timorese Refugees
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Joint Appeal - Solutions for East Timorese Refugees
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/94/summary
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
13-Jan-2026
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
| Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Japan, Government of | 5.6 | 33.8% |
| European Commission | 4.8 | 28.5% |
| Australia, Government of | 3.2 | 18.9% |
| United States of America, Government of | 1.8 | 11.0% |
| Portugal, Government of | 1.0 | 5.9% |
| Norway, Government of | 0.2 | 1.4% |
| Sweden, Government of | 0.1 | 0.4% |
Funding progress by cluster
Joint Appeal - Solutions for East Timorese Refugees
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/94/summary
Funding progress by cluster
13-Jan-2026
: US$0
Not specified: US$16,644,761
Funding progress by cluster/sector
| Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
| Not specified | n/a | 16.6 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2002
Joint Appeal - Solutions for East Timorese Refugees
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/94/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2002
13-Jan-2026