Humanitarian Crisis in Southern Africa 2002 - ZIMBABWE
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
Trends in coordinated plan requirements
01-Dec-2024
Amounts shown for the current year (far right bar) are for the year to date. No data is shown in years where there was no plan/appeal.
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
Plan funding as a proportion of emergency funding
01-Dec-2024
Largest sources of coordinated plan funding
Funding for coordinated plan (US$m) | As a share of overall funding to the coordinated plan (%) | |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom, Government of | 3.5 | 33.0% |
European Commission | 2.7 | 25.3% |
Netherlands, Government of | 0.9 | 8.1% |
UNICEF National Committee/United Kingdom | 0.7 | 7.1% |
Sweden, Government of | 0.3 | 3.1% |
UNICEF National Committee/Germany | 0.3 | 2.7% |
Canada, Government of | 0.3 | 2.6% |
UNICEF National Committee/Ireland | 0.2 | 1.9% |
Italy, Government of | 0.2 | 1.9% |
United Nations Children's Fund | 0.2 | 1.8% |
Funding progress by cluster
Funding progress by cluster/sector
Cluster/Sector | Required (US$m) | Funded (US$m) | Coverage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
n/a | 0.0 | n/a | |
Not specified | n/a | 10.5 | n/a |
About coordinated plans
Each UN coordinated inter-agency coordinated plan has a page on FTS, which present all funding linked to the requirements of the coordinated plan; this funding is a subset of overall funding to the affected country. The coordinated plans are a key part of the humanitarian programme cycle (HPC) used by humanitarian country teams to plan and coordinate a response and to communicate the scope of response operations.
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2002
Humanitarian Crisis in Southern Africa 2002 - ZIMBABWE
https://fts.unocha.org/plans/98/summary
Coordinated plan snapshot for 2002
01-Dec-2024